Comparative Politics: the State of the Subdiscipline
| dc.contributor.author | Laitin, David | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-07T12:09:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-08-07T12:09:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2000-09 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In earlier decades, there was a consensus about a specific comparative method. It was differentiated from a statistical and from a case-study methodology, and it emphasized through the use of strategic controls the isolation of key variables that could explain variations in outcomes. However, Laitin argues that this consensus is no longer representative of the field. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | American Political Science Association | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://bibliotecadigital.academia.cl/xmlui/handle/123456789/605 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | es_CL |
| dc.publisher | Standford University | es_CL |
| dc.title | Comparative Politics: the State of the Subdiscipline | es_CL |
| dc.type | Working Paper | es_CL |
